The art of media analysis: It’s not just a science
It seems too often those involved in data analysis rely on only science when conducting a study. Which is fair enough, in some cases – science is, after all, a crucial part of any analysis.
As well, it seems there’s usually a heavy emphasis placed on process, methodology and even on the academic or scientific credentials of those conducting the study.
I certainly don’t want to take away from the importance of this. However, the coolest and most valuable analysis comes from determining the nuances of an issue and not just the numbers.
This is what I call “the art of analysis.”
In my opinion, the best results are derived from multiple data sources. When overlaid on top of one another patterns begin to emerge and real insights can be gleaned. Indeed, those looking to conduct the most valuable analysis need to get up close and personal with the information, and even more granular with the data to understand its nuances.
A good example of this was our recent report on the Keystone XL debate in the United States. After doing a deep dive into the data, we discovered that most opponents of the pipeline used the term “tar sands” when describing its proposed energy source. Supporters, on the other hand, typically used the term “oil sands.”
But sometimes even the data doesn’t give up the nuances. Sometimes, you may have to go directly to the source.
For example, we at MediaMiser recently conducted a report on the personal brands of various players at the NHL All-Star Game in Ottawa. Some of us were at the festivities at Scotiabank Place or watched them on CBC, and just being there gave us further insights into the data once we got back to the office.
Understanding those nuanced issues – such as the fact that the jokester Carey Price was a fan favourite, while Washington Capitals star Alex Ovechkin (who skipped the game) was clearly not – gave the report that extra edge. Having passion in what you are analyzing is extremely important, so much so that sometimes you need to completely immerse yourself in the issue.This helps spur truly great analysis.
There’s of course always the risk of not seeing the forest through the trees without a strong science-based foundation, which is why the science is also extremely important. After all, you don’t want to fall into a trap of being influenced by something coincidental.
But without paying attention to those nuances, you could be missing key insights. It’s the nuances that can help transform analysis simply from something credible, to something that people can’t live without.



















