Clarification on Government spending on Media Monitoring vs Polling
A story on the front page of the Ottawa Citizen today featured this headline:
Media monitoring trumps polling spending; Government more interested in what media says than in opinion of average voter.
This story by Glen McGregor immediately and not surprisingly captured my attention since MediaMiser builds technology and offers services for media monitoring and analysis. I certainly was interested in the reporter’s take on how the Government of Canada has been moving resources from public opinion polling to media monitoring.
The headline, however, like many others in the news, seemed worded to provoke rather than to illuminate. Not a problem I thought. The headline’s job, after all, is not to tell the story, but rather to draw in the reader. It’s the lead’s job to take us to the heart of the story. Unfortunately, I do have some issues with the lead.
Media monitoring is not used for research
First, media monitoring is not used for research purposes. The role of media monitoring is to keep decision makers, including government staff, up to speed with current events and the nature of media coverage on those events.
This is something MediaMiser does very well. In fact, our technology and services have enabled our public-sector clients to both spend less money on resources and obtain better information for government decision-makers.
Media analysis is used for research
In-depth media analysis is where the research component happens. This is something MediaMiser is very familiar with, and we’re very good at it. When we developed our technology 8+ years ago, our main objective was to turn news into knowledge. That’s what we did for our first clients and what we still do for the majority of our current clients, most of whom, interestingly enough, reside in the private sector.
The reason why media analysis is so important is not just because it’s just cost effective, but also because it, unlike polling, can provide clients with the intelligence they need very quickly. Media analysis, done right, also supplies the type of insight polls can’t offer.
For example, before the last recession, most polls were reporting a high public confidence in the economy. At the same time, media gatekeepers were taking a decidedly less rosy view and sending out warning signals. Unfortunately, many governments tended to put their faith in the public polls. The rest is history.
Also, within the Canadian government, we have seen, time and again, polls not being able to predict which way public opinion will shift. Case in point, Canada’s long-form census debate only became an issue when the media reported on it. It wasn’t until the media educated the public that most Canadians became aware of the role the long-form census played in government and business decision making. To be fair, others empathized with the government’s stated intent to protect privacy.
As media monitoring and analysis firms tracked the issue, most of us were able to measure public opinion on the issue as it played out in social media.
Social media means spending more dollars
One thing not addressed in the Citizen story is the amount of money dedicated to monitoring social media where individual opinions are expressed in nanoseconds. As we have seen recently in Egypt, Iran, and in Canada’s own G20 gathering, when the public speaks in large numbers through Twitter, Facebook, and other social media channels, wise governments sit up and take notice. In fact, when social media is properly analyzed, the voice of the people comes through loud and clear. However, monitoring and analyzing social media, while very effective, is not cheap. Monitoring and analysis firms are continually making big investments in software, hardware, and people. Working with vast amounts of information, requires a lot of computing power, but I believe that ultimately this computing power is far more cost effective than polling.
Much of the monitoring budgets are paid to content providers
Ironically, part of Glen McGregor’s salary is subsidized by corporate clients such as the Government of Canada. Like other monitoring and analysis clients, the government has to pay royalties to such media companies as Postmedia, the Ottawa Citizen’s owner. No complaints here. It’s only fair that the media be compensated for intellectual property. If the government were to acquire that content without paying, it would breaking its own copyright laws.
Conclusion
Yes, polling is still a valuable piece to the research puzzle. However, with the emergence of new technologies and the growing importance of social media, the role of other types of research-gathering methodologies should be neither ignored nor condemned. If they are, it will be to the detriment of society and the new transparency that comes to the forefront with every tweet and every media story.
Personally I don’t believe “departments are left to formulate policy in the dark.” They simply are applying something most people already know. Traditional and social media not only provide us with knowledge that helps form our opinions but also reflect what the public is thinking.
Furthermore, in some cases, the social media space is fast creating a 21st century alternative to yesterday’s sample population universe.

